Categories
Environmental Laws

Okanagan Water Law for Wineries

It\’s already a major issue for wineries in California. I know that faculty at UC Davis are now considering water needs and ability to survive drought as an important factor when selecting rootstocks for new vineyard plantings. Here in water-abundant Canada, this has historically not been a major concern. But an article in Wine Business Monthly Online shines a light on similar Canadian concerns in its review of the Okanagan Sustainable Water Strategy and the implications for wineries in the region. The article points out that winery use of water is a tiny percentage of overall usage and that conversion to drip irrigation is making industry use of the resource even more efficient.


The legal implications of water usage are still generally a backburner issue. However, occasionally, as the article points out, the Province can use its powers under environmental laws to cut off water supplies to users as happened for some Okanagan wineries in 2003 during a drought. In addition, water concerns can block development, whether residential or otherwise (including wineries), if the development threatens to change water usage or conservation patterns.

Categories
Shipping, Border, Import, Export Laws

Shipping Laws on Wine within Canada

This article summarizes the laws that apply when wine is shipped between Canadian provinces for personal consumption. Please note that other articles apply for the following situations:

Bringing Wine Back Between Provinces After a Trip

Bringing Wine Back to Canada After an International Trip

This article provides a summary of the shipping laws regarding wine (and other liquor) within Canada. This article is updated frequently and was current as of October 2019. However, the laws in this area are changing rapidly. Please contact a lawyer in order to ensure that you have the latest information. 

The shipping of any alcohol from one province into another province was previously prohibited by a federal law (which stems from the prohibition era) called the Importation of Intoxicating Liquors Act (Canada). However, in June 2019, the federal government repealed this prohibition entirely in respect of the interprovincial transport or shipment of alcohol. Nevertheless, the various provinces have not embraced the spirit of this reform and have created various provincial laws and barriers to interprovincial “direct to consumer” shipments.

The Supreme Court of Canada decision in R. v. Comeau was released in April 2018. Generally, the court upheld provincial legal restrictions on the inter-provincial purchase/import of alcohol as long as they are connected to a legitimate provincial objective other than restricting trade. This decision directly affects the issues discussed on this page. Legal advice may be required on the implications of this decision.

The following chart summarizes my views on the ability of consumers to receive “direct to consumer” interprovincial shipments of wine under the laws in the various provinces.

British Columbia
DTC from Winery?Yes
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity LimitsAmount for personal consumption if 100% Cdn wine from winery. 
CommentsDTC sales and shipment is permitted only for 100% Canadian wine purchased directly from a winery. BC has also eliminated the limits on alcohol importations from other provinces but only in respect of “in-person” importations (no shipment).
Alberta
DTC from Winery?Unclear
DTC from Retailer?Unclear
Quantity LimitsAmount for personal consumption
CommentsAlberta law says that adults may “import” liquor from other provinces (and other countries) in amounts determined by regulation. The regulation (s.89) makes importation from other provinces “subject to the policies of the Board”. The Board’s policies are set out in section 3.27 of this manual and which restrict importation to amounts that are personally transported (i.e. not shipped). It is not clear whether this “policy statement” has a valid basis in Alberta law since it may not be consistent with the language in the Act and Regulation.
Saskatchewan
DTC from Winery?Yes (from BC only)
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity Limits9 litres
CommentsSaskatchewan is open for DTC shipments of wine and spirits from BC only (not other provinces). An authorization (for the customer) is required from the SLGA which is valid for one year. Maximum quantity per shipment is 9 litres (one case) but multiple shipments are allowed. The customer is required to submit markup to the SLGA upon receipt of the shipment. The markup for wine is $5.25 per 750 ml bottle. See details here: Direct Shipment to Saskatchewan.
Manitoba
DTC from Winery?Yes
DTC from Retailer?Yes
Quantity LimitsAmount for personal consumption
CommentsSection 71 of Manitoba’s new law governing both alcohol and cannabis refers to the fact that it is permissible to possess and consume liquor that has been “lawfully imported” into Manitoba. Manitoba’s liquor web site indicates that DTC is permissible.
Ontario
DTC from Winery?No
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity Limits9 litres
CommentsOntario has recently amended its laws to prohibit the possession of alcohol that has been imported from other provinces unless the alcohol was imported by or under the authority of the LCBO.
Quebec
DTC from Winery?No
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity Limits9 litres
CommentsProvincial law restricts transport of wine not purchased from liquor board within Quebec. Regulations have been issued which allow the importation of alcohol from other provinces but they only permit 9 liters of wine per person and only if it has been personally transported (no direct to consumer shipment).
New Brunswick
DTC from Winery?No
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity LimitsSingle bottle
CommentsThe recent decision in R. v. Comeau upheld New Brunswick’s provincial laws that restrict its residents from purchasing and importing wine from outside the province beyond a “single bottle”.
Prince Edward Island
DTC from Winery?Yes
DTC from Retailer?Yes
Quantity Limits9 litres
CommentsIt is my view that the only reasonable interpretation of the word “import” in the amended legislation includes both in person transport and direct shipment. The PEI liquor board is stating that it is not open for shipment, only for “in-person transport”. In my view, this is not a reasonable interpretation of PEI law.
Nova Scotia
DTC from Winery?Yes
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity Limits
CommentsOK for Canadian wine purchased from a winery. Nova Scotia announced it is open for DTC wine shipments on June 25, 2015.
Newfoundland
DTC from Winery?No
DTC from Retailer?No
Quantity LimitsNone
CommentsNL only permits “in person” importations from out of province as described in the accompanying article. Note that the NL liquor board charged FedEx with shipping BC wine from a winery to a customer in Newfoundland. The case did not proceed after the defence lawyer made an argument that NL laws could not reach a federally regulated courier such as FedEx.
Categories
Latest News

Winery Ownership Legal Disputes in the News

A couple of prominent California wineries have been in the news recently regarding ownership disputes between \”winemaker owners\” and their partners. The first dispute relates to Pax Wine Cellars in Sonoma where the namesake winemaker, Pax Mahle, has been fired and is locked in a dispute with the majority owner . The second dispute relates to Napa flagship winery, Joseph Phelps, where a former employee (the winemaker) and the estate of the late Tom Shelton who was the CEO (and widely known throughout the industry) are also fighting over the value of minority ownership shares with the majority owners .

While these disputes are no doubt unique and while some disagreements are inevitable, these types of lawsuits do show the value of ownership and succession planning. Wineries are not unique to these issues – many, many businesses (particularly family owned ones) do not pay sufficient attention to succession planning until either a dispute arises or one of the key people leaves or passes away. Does your winery have a succession plan for key personnel? If not, you should contact your legal and financial advisors for assistance in implementing one.

 

 

Categories
Latest News

Wine Law in the Globe & Mail

Yesterday\’s Globe and Mail contained an excellent article by Beppi Crosariol on Canada\’s arcane inter-provincial barriers for shipping wine . This site was referred to in the article and WineLaw\’s principal, Mark Hicken, was quoted and two photos were included.

The national coverage on this issue is appreciated. Hopefully and since we are in the middle of a federal election campaign, this will bring the issue to the forefront and there will be some action from the relevant governments and liquor boards to fix this problem.

We are currently working on an updated article on shipping law which has now been posted . Of course, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us directly .

Categories
Latest News

BC Out of Province Wine Shipping Ends

The LCBO and the Manitoba liquor control board have recently threatened two BC wineries for direct shipping to out of province customers (see Vancouver Sun story ). In addition, they contacted the BC LCLB who is now warning wineries that it is illegal to make such shipments under the Importation of Intoxicating Liquors Act. The legal background to these issues is covered in my earlier article on shipping for the industry .

The impetus for all of this is, of course, lost revenue. Direct shipments to wineries in other provinces bypass the relevant liquor boards and their regime of markups/fees/taxes. However, Manitoba and Ontario do not have a monopoly on this type of behaviour. BC\’s rules with respect to wine coming into this province are exactly the same (see s.65 of the BC Liquor Control and Licensing Act).

With 2010 on the horizon, isn\’t it time for Canada\’s liquor boards to reform this system? A prohibition era system of liquor distribution is simply not appropriate for Canada in the 21st century … particularly, as we try to encourage and expand an increasingly successful wine industry.

Update (Sept  19/08): Please see my updated article on shipping for more information on this issue . A thorough legal analysis will also be posted shortly. Please contact me directly for additional information.

Categories
Latest News

BC\’s Real Sales Tax on Wine: 90% or More?

When you buy a bottle of wine in a store or restaurant in BC, your receipt will usually indicate that you paid 10% provincial sales tax and 5% GST on your purchase. Have you really paid 15% tax on your bottle of wine? Absolutely not.

It may surprise you to hear that the real tax rate on imported wine in BC is much, much higher. It varies with the price of the bottle but, for example, if you go into a BC liquor store and buy a bottle of $14 California wine, the real cost of selling that bottle to you is about $6.45 (including LDB operating costs). The remaining $7.55 goes to both levels of goverment with the vast bulk going to the BC government. If you express the part that goes to BC as a percentage of the actual cost of selling the wine, then the \”real\” BC sales tax rate is about 111%.

Categories
Shipping, Border, Import Laws

Bringing Wine Back to Canada After an International Trip

This article summarizes the laws that apply when a person travels to another country and then brings wine for personal consumption back with them to their home province at the end of the trip. Please note that other articles apply for the following situations:

Bringing Wine Back Between Provinces After a Trip

Shipping Wine Between Provinces (i.e. not bringing it back with you)

So you are taking a vacation abroad? Maybe to a nice wine producing area like France, Italy or California. And you would like to bring some wine back with you?

Duty Free Allowance

How much can you bring back? Well, the duty-free allowance (following trips of 48 hours or more) for bringing wine back to Canada is only 1.5 litres per person which is a rather miserly 2 bottles. You are allowed to bring back 8.5 litres of beer but only 2 bottles of wine. See CBSA site for the limits. If you are within the duty-free allowance, you won\’t have to pay anything extra. Technically, there is zero duty-free allowance for alcohol for trips of less than 48 hours. If you are lucky and have a nice customs person (of which there are quite a few), you might be allowed to bring back more. 

Charges & Fees Above Duty Free Allowance (For Wine Accompanying Traveller – Not for Wine that is Shipped Separately)

If you are above the duty-free limit but within the import limit for your province (45 litres for BC), you will have to pay applicable taxes, markups and duties. In BC, those charges are more than 100% of the value of the wine – that will quickly negate any savings.

As an example, for BC only, here are the extra charges that you may have to pay on wine above your duty-free allowance. For each 750 ml of bottle, the fees are as follows:

Customs Duty: $0.00 on U.S. wine, $0.03 on most other wine
Excise Duty: $0.49
GST:

5% of (purchase price + customs duty + excise duty)

BC Liquor Board Markup: 85% of (purchase price + customs duty + excise duty) with a minimum fee of $1.83 and a maximum of $12.75
PST: 10%

Generally, the border fees will exceed the amount that you paid for the wine at retail. So, for example, on an $8.00 bottle of wine, you will pay almost an additional $10 at the border. Only 91 cents of that goes to the federal government. The rest are provincial fees, mostly Liquor Board markups and fees.

However, you should note that because the LDB markup/fee caps out a maximum of $12.75 per bottle, and depending upon the price of the bottle, the personal import of more expensive wine may be economic. It is important to have receipts for all wine that is imported in the manner set out above – particularly if you are picking up wine that you have ordered online.

IMPORTANT: the above charges are only valid in the \”traveller stream\” (i.e. for individuals returning from a trip with liquor accompanying them). They are not valid if you try to import the wine yourself without going on a trip or if you arrange to have it shipped to you while you are away. In these latter situations, the import process is very complicated and the charges may be even higher. At the present time, I do not recommend that any BC resident have wine shipped to BC from abroad.

Comparisons With Other Jurisdictions

By contrast, the United States allows 1 litre of wine for its residents to bring back duty-free (less than Canada!) but the duty and tax rates on anything over the limit are extremely low: 3% duty (not applicable for Canadian wine due to NAFTA) plus maybe some other IRS or state taxes if applicable. In addition, I am told that even these amounts are not often charged on reasonable amounts that are brought back.

For even greater contrast, look at the EU: for example, if you go over to France from England, you can apparently bring back up to 90 litres of wine without problem! See HM Customs page for wine import information .

Differences Between Provinces

The fees levied at the border within Canada vary depending upon what province you return into. As a result, your return point of entry may dramatically affect the fees: see this CBSA (Canada Customs) memorandum which sets out the details of border tax collection. For example, if you are a resident of BC but return to Canada via Alberta, you will be charged the Alberta markups when you re-enter Canada (this is because Canada Customs does not have the jurisdiction to levy fees from one province in a different one). The fees in BC are very high for low to moderately priced wine. By contrast, in Alberta there is a flat per bottle fee charged, around $3 per bottle.

For Ontario: import info is here on the LCBO site. For Quebec: import info is here on the SAQ site.

Legal Authority to Collect Border Charges

There is no doubt that CBSA (Canada Customs) has the authority to collect taxes and duties at the border when you return to Canada. However, the vast majority of the amounts charged on wine (and other alcohol) are not taxes or duties … they are liquor board markups. Liquor board markup is legally not valid as a tax (although all the revenue still goes to the relevant provincial government). It is imposed by the various liquor boards on the legal basis that they \”own\” the liquor in question and, as such, can levy whatever profits and fees they like on it. However, a small problem arises at the border because you, as the traveller, have already purchased the liquor (i.e. you own it) when you are bringing it back. In order to fix this, the liquor boards have created an artificial legal structure whereby they vest the customs officer with the power to act as an agent of the liquor board. The customs officer/liquor board agent then technically expropriates (seizes) your liquor from you (without compensating you) and will then release it back to you only when you pay all of the markups and fees. Don\’t believe me? Check out section 19 of the Liquor Distribution Act. There is also some federal legislation (which clearly relates only to tax), an \”order-in-council\” (which doesn\’t add much) and an agreement between the CBSA and the LDB.

Personally, I have some doubts as to the legal validity of this structure since the liquor board appears to be using its statutory monopoly power as a regulator to impose markups at levels which are excessive in order to discourage competition with its retail arm. For example, the markups discussed above are applied to the full retail price that you paid for the wine. Since markups are applied to the wholesale cost within BC and since the liquor board has no costs associated with your imported purchase, it seems punitive to impose this level of markup. In addition, since BC wine purchased directly from a winery has zero markup, it seems unfair (NAFTA? GATT?) to charge these levels of markup at the border when you purchase wine in exactly the same way from a winery in WA, OR or CA.

But until someone challenges it, that\’s the legal authority.

 

Categories
Retail and Distribution Laws

Private Transactions of Wine in BC

BC has extremely restrictive laws regarding the sale of wine (and all liquor). These laws stem from the prohibition era and may not make much sense to you.

Nevertheless, the end result of the law is that wine cannot be sold in BC unless it is sold under a license issued by the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch. There are no exemptions for private sales or for sales of wine through auction unless you go through the LDB. The relevant law (s.38 of the Liquor Control and Licensing Act ) reads as follows:

38  (1) Except as provided in this Act, the Liquor Distribution Act or the regulations made under those Acts, a person must not, personally or by his or her clerk, employee or agent, keep for sale, sell or, in consideration of the purchase or transfer of property or for other consideration, give liquor to another person.

(2) Despite subsection (1), a delivery service may purchase liquor on behalf of a customer during the days and hours for sale of liquor prescribed in that area and deliver the liquor to the customer, if the charge for the liquor is no more than the liquor store price plus the delivery service charge.

(3) A licensee must not sell liquor except

(a) liquor purchased from the Liquor Distribution Branch, and

(b) in accordance with this Act, the regulations and the terms and conditions of the licence.

As you will notice, this law is very broad in that, unless you are specifically permitted to do so by that statute or the Liquor Distribution Act, you cannot sell liquor, you cannot keep it for sale, you cannot give it to another person if you receive any "consideration" for the transfer. Of course, the two statutes that are mentioned basically only permit sales if you have a license from the LCLB. 

As a result, it is illegal in BC to sell liquor privately or to barter it or otherwise trade it for consideration. This applies even if you originally bought the liquor from a government source such as a BC Liquor Store. So you cannot legally sell or auction your old bottles of wine in BC. You can't legally trade them either. All you can do with them is drink them!

Categories
Latest News

Wine Labelling Laws: Lessons from CA

There is an interesting article on California\’s wine labelling laws in the San Francisco Chronicle today . It covers the issues and obstacles that the Napa Valley Vintners have had in dealing with new sub-appellations within the larger designated California appellations such as Napa and Sonoma. The article explains the problems that arose when a new sub-appellation was proposed for Calistoga which affected the winery, Calistoga Cellars, which buys most of its grapes from outside Napa.

 

Categories
Labelling and Content Laws

Content and Labelling Laws for BC (Detailed)

The Wines of Marked Quality Regulation is the guts of BC\’s new wine labelling and content regulation. It creates 2 categories of wine: 1) the familiar \”BC VQA\” wine category which is actually a slightly watered down version of the old one, and 2) a new lesser category, the \”BC Wine of Distinction\”. BC VQA wines must meet all the requirements of the BC Wine of Distinction plus some additional ones (the most contentious of which is a taste test).